🔗 Share this article

Tehran is prepared to reinitiate nuclear discussions with the United States as long as it is treated with "dignity" and "honor", Tehran's top diplomat has stated.

The Iranian diplomat said solely negotiations was effective, and revealed fresh requests had been made by intermediaries to resume discussions with the US government. He claimed Iran had zero unreported enrichment locations, and Tehran could not yet allow the UN nuclear inspectorate to access bombed nuclear sites for protective measures.

Walking a Difficult Course

The foreign minister is navigating a difficult route since Iran does not want appear to be proceeding from a situation of weakness, and he insisted repeatedly that Iran had emerged more powerful militarily and emotionally from the Israeli-US attack on its atomic facilities in June.

He was speaking at a defense forum in Tehran where he reiterated that Iran had "an absolute privilege to refine atomic fuel on home soil that it will always maintain" – the primary cause of the impasse in the prior discussions.

Previous Discussions Suddenly Concluded

The prior phases of negotiations between the US and Iran were brought to an abrupt and hostile conclusion on 12 June when Israel, with Washington's assistance, targeted Tehran's atomic facilities in a 12-day war that culminated with Donald Trump claiming the locations had been eliminated. Following this, EU nations employed their right to reinstate UN-wide sanctions, but Iran insists they have not had a major impact.

Perfect Agreement Suggested

Tehran representatives said they felt they had attained a "perfect agreement" to the enrichment issue in prior discussions, when it was agreed an Iran-based consortium with American involvement could enrich uranium. The two nations would have been able to assert triumph since domestic enrichment would have continued and the US could be confident that Iran's nuclear programme was entirely non-military.

It had not been decided in the talks that American atomic experts could work inside Iran, but that was a reasonable assumption of the cooperative offer. Representatives stated three times they had secured an understanding with the US representative Steve Witkoff only for the arrangement to fall apart due to "opponents in the US".

Current Position

Iran's diplomats said the partnership proposal was now withdrawn, but it seems quite possible the offer could be revived in some form if negotiations resume.

The US president in recent days claimed he had been receiving messages that Iran wanted to resume discussions, but confidentially Iran's diplomats say they are not yet receiving coherent offers from the United States either explicitly or from important Middle Eastern intermediaries, such as Qatar, Egypt, the Omani authorities and Saudi Arabia. The Iranian foreign ministry has been criticized of inactivity in the aftermath of Washington's unmediated tactics, but Tehran states negotiations is not part of a show.

Political Standpoint

In his remarks to the forum, intended to paint the US as a controlling nation that exploits the concept of international law, the foreign minister stated the two-week conflict showed the dispute could not be ended by armed force. He asserted the strikes commenced with a Washington's ultimatum for an complete Tehran capitulation and culminated with an complete request for a halt to hostilities.

Iran is assured the initial Israeli attacks were executed with complete American awareness and coordination, making faith challenging to rebuild.

Dialogue Stays the Final Solution

The foreign minister said: "It was not Iran that had deserted negotiations; it was the United States and the Western nations that had always sought to impose their will during the talks. Diplomacy can still be viable and continues the final answer to settle disagreements, but its standards, rules and fundamentals must be followed."

"Provided that they speak to the nation of Iran with the approach of dignity and honor, they will get a response in the same tone."

Recovery and Rebuilding

In what is characterized by Iran's diplomats as the conflict of restoration and recovery, Araghchi said he was assured Iran's military capacities "are much stronger than before 13 or 14 June of this year. Every aspect of our defense have been reestablished. We acquired numerous insights from this war; we have come to know our personal limitations and the weaknesses of the adversary."

He added: "We managed to survive this engagement. Our atomic expertise, which they aimed to obliterate, remains in place. The sites and gear, if destroyed, will be restored; what is crucial is the resolve of the citizens of Tehran and then the social solidarity that they sought to undermine, but failed to shatter. The citizens of Tehran have grown more powerful, more united, and more backing of the administration and the country in the face of this invasion."